Advertising and financial promotions – MI and actions (Outcomes 2, 3 and 5) |
|
Review period: |
|
Data measured (MI) |
What this MI shows |
Target
(Set by your firm. Should be what your firm believes will demonstrate TCF in relation to the six consumer outcomes) |
Result |
Actions
(Where target not met indicate how root cause will be investigated and recommended timescales for remedial action) |
|
Volume of complaints by promotion type (advertisement, DM) |
Could indicate that promotion is unclear or inaccurate, depending on the nature of the complaint.
The nature of the complaint, root cause, and decision taken can indicate whether a customer has been treated fairly. |
|
|
|
|
Number of compliance breaches picked up by the in-house approval process |
May indicate:
- approval processes are operating satisfactorily
- a poor technical understanding in marketing areas – training need
- a poor understanding of what constitutes clear, fair and not misleading information – training need
|
|
|
|
|
Number of compliance breaches picked up by FSA |
Misleading information reaching the customer. May indicate problems with the approval process and/or a poor technical understanding in the marketing areas. |
|
|
|
|
Number of promotions pre-tested with target customers |
Evidences embedding of TCF in financial promotions development. |
|
|
|