|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Register Here
Free registration for our regular Newsletter and new content updates
Send to colleague
Send a link to this page to a colleague. |
Sorting and reviewing its sales figures using these different criteria – and by sales consultant - allows the firm to spot trends which could indicate the risk of unsuitable advice and therefore unfair treatment of customers. (Please see our MI checklist for the TCF risks associated with these characteristics, and for other criteria that the firm could use. Also see the later section below on how an Excel spreadsheet is used to collate these figures.) An example of MI leading to corrective action - Sales consultant ‘B’
ABC’s MI for the last review period shows that one consultant (‘B’):
A review of his files (triggered by the MI trends) shows that:
Sales consultant B is called in for an appraisal. The cases are discussed in relation to TCF and suitability of advice. A program of remedial action is discussed and agreed, including a customer exercise.
Consultant B is required to attend a refresher MPPI sales training course and a TCF regional workshop specifically focusing on suitability of advice. In the short term all of Consultant B’s cases are checked by the Sales Director before offers are made.
The next month reveals that consultant B’s MI is in line with the benchmarks expected and therefore the firm is able to demonstrate/evidence to the FSA that they are achieving Outcome 4.
The firm continues to monitor the MI on a regular basis. How the firm tracks and acts upon its sales MI
Consultants’ sales are tracked on an Excel spreadsheet which is updated each time a sale is made.
TCF MI – further practical examples from the FSA (opens new window)
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This site is owned and managed by Frank Eve Consulting Limited.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||